Back to site

Kelly Bradshaw – Planning Law: Can the council de-zone land that has been zoned for development?

In Killegland Estates Ltd v Meath County Council, the Supreme Court upheld the Meath County Council’s decision to change the zoning of a 0.84-hectare site from residential to community infrastructure. Killegland Estates Ltd had challenged the decision on the grounds that the council failed to provide adequate justification for de-zoning, which they argued negatively impacted their property rights and investment. The Court found that the council had indeed provided sufficient reasoning. Their decision was grounded in established planning policies; particularly the National Planning Framework (NPF) and the Regional Spatial and Economic Strategy (RSES) which support in-fill development and sustainable regional growth. The Supreme Court affirmed that local authorities are empowered to exercise discretion in zoning decisions as long as their actions are supported by clear, documented reasoning that aligns with national and regional objectives.

Legal Implications:

  1. Affirmation of Local Authority Discretion:
    The judgment reinforces that local councils have the authority to make zoning decisions within the framework of national planning policies, provided they articulate adequate justifications.
  2. Clarity on Reason-Giving Obligations:
    While councils must provide clear reasons for zoning changes, the decision demonstrates flexibility in the level of detail required, as long as the core planning objectives and legal requirements are met.
  3. Precedent for Future Judicial Reviews:
    Future appellants challenging zoning decisions will now face the standard that they must show a significant departure from established planning principles or a demonstrable failure in providing sufficient reasons—not merely a difference in opinion regarding policy.
  4. Support for Sustainable Development Policies:
    The case underlines the importance of adhering to the NPF and RSES, which aim to promote sustainable growth and encourage in-fill development, thereby balancing development needs with infrastructural capacities.

Overall, the decision serves as a key reference for future disputes over zoning, striking a balance between the necessity for transparent, accountable governance and the practical flexibility required in local planning decisions.

# dezone